'/%3E%3Ctext%20x='48'%20y='63'%20font-family='Arial'%20font-size='46'%20font-weight='bold'%20fill='%23fff'%20text-anchor='middle'%3EP%3C/text%3E%3C/svg%3E)
Polly
Portcast AI Planning Agent
Handed off from Ruth, your AI Route Planning AgentWhat I pulled
You asked me to pressure-test your contracted CJX service (Colombo → New York) against the market. I pulled 12 months of schedule-reliability for every carrier and service on this lane. Note: CJX is a co-loaded VSA run by CMA CGM, COSCO, EMC (Evergreen) and OOCL — so its performance tracks those carriers.
Polly · reliability read on this lane
Colombo → New York is a low-reliability lane — the 12-month market average sits at just 25% on-time. Only Maersk (86%) is dependable; Hapag-Lloyd (62%) is mid and slipping. Your contracted CJX service is run by CMA CGM, COSCO, OOCL and EMC — all in the bottom half of the lane (18–22% 12-mo on-time) — and CJX carries a 25% cancellation rate. The lane's strongest option is the Maersk / Hapag US4·TP16 service: fastest actual transit (26.6d) and 0% cancellations. If schedule integrity matters, the data favours shifting time-critical volume toward Maersk / US4·TP16 over CJX.
31%
Lane on-time (now)
▼ 7 pts vs 12 mo ago
25%
12-month avg score
rolling Jun ’25 – Jun ’26
86%
Most reliable carrier
Maersk
81 pts
Best–worst spread
reliability varies widely
Reliability evolutionSailings-weighted lane average vs preferred carriers · monthly on-time %
Market avgMaerskHapag-Lloyd★ CMA CGM★ COSCO★ OOCL★ Evergreen
Click a carrier (legend or table) to isolate it and overlay its service strings.
Carrier reliability — Colombo → New York/Newark
Maersk
Hapag-Lloyd
Wan Hai
CMA CGM
OOCL
Evergreen
COSCO
MSC
ZIM
ONE
Yang Ming
HMMService reliability — VSA / co-loaded services · last 30 days